Publication candidate — pending trustee adoption. This document is a complete operating proposal, not yet effective policy. It takes effect only when adopted by recorded resolution of the MSK REGEN trustees. It is not legal advice, regulatory accreditation, or a substitute for local clinical, research, employment or institutional governance.
Document control
Policies are published as permanent, versioned webpages with a downloadable copy once approved. Superseded versions are archived and dated; corrections carry a dated note. A withdrawn or expired status is not left discoverable as current through metadata, schema or cached feeds, and machine-readable data matches the visible copy.
Public registers
IAMRegen maintains a senior conflicts-of-interest register and a public register of recognised Centres of Excellence (with designation, scope, lead Fellow, country and validity dates). Published scientific outputs are listed with their full provenance after publication.
How IAMRegen is governed: MSK REGEN is the sole legal operator, trustees hold ultimate authority, and the Founding Five act only within written delegation. Members and Fellows have no governance vote.
How IAMRegen declares and manages actual, potential and perceived conflicts of interest, including the editorial roles at ORTST, and where the senior-interests register is published.
Expected and prohibited conduct across IAMRegen activities, the event and photography rule, and how breaches are handled.
How to raise a complaint about IAMRegen, the service standards and response targets, how decisions are made fairly, and the review and appeal route.
IAMRegen’s safeguarding commitment, named reporting routes, guidance for situations of immediate danger, and the limits of confidentiality.
How to raise concerns about wrongdoing or scientific misconduct, the protection from retaliation, and how such matters are handled.
The ORTST publishing partnership, editorial independence and recusals, authorship rules, AI policy, and how official IAMRegen outputs are identified.
The IAMRegen Delphi protocol: two anonymous online rounds and in-person ratification, the 1–9 rating scale, consensus thresholds, panel composition and reporting.